Friday, August 12, 2005

Hip Hop Hip?

Hip hop, to me, is like Indian food: I’m embarrassed to dismiss it almost completely, I’ve got to say.

I believe in art, I really do. I think envelopes need to be pushed, listeners need to be challenged, and stagnation equals death.

And the evolution of hip hop fits the musical ideals I cherish, seeing as how it evolved out of necessity, out of inner-city black youth’s desire to create something. They used the tools at hand (records, turntables, mics and words) to create something unique. Being a fan of a little bit of music that’s outside of the bounds of Western scales, like Pakistani and African stuff, I bristle when people turn their noses up when music doesn’t fit their preconceived notions.

I saw an interview with a reggae musician once, and he talked about how music can be everywhere. I forget who he was, but he said that even car keys on a table can create music. I agree. Find sounds, blend tones and rhythms and vocals (or not) and see what the hell comes out, you know?

***

Hip hop, however, almost never moves me, and frankly, for a man who tries to be broad-minded where music is concerned, this is embarrassing.

I’m not apologizing though. Taste is taste, ultimately. You like chocolate, I like vanilla… No one wins a subjectivity debate.

But there’s something about hip hop that, top to bottom, doesn’t work for me.

Who killed hip hop? The suspects:

I suspect the lack of melody. Deconstructing music is a terrific idea, but when you reconstruct it without melody, I guess this Beatles baby gets left out.

The subject matter. God knows some bright, creative wordsmiths are out there today, but for every group like the Roots there are 50 buffoons talking about who’s a ho and bling bling and 40s. Hell, I’m not exactly part of the demographic, right?

Artificial sounds. I know loops and samples and drum machines and the like are, in theory, endlessly creative. Snip this, nick that, stretch everything else… And maybe you’ve done something creative by building a new beat from a Curtis Mayfield sample melded with a Maceo Parker sax lick, with doomsday bass rattling underneath. But it sort of works out like jazz jams: To everyone except the music fanatics who can pinpoint how clever what you’ve constructed is, it’s just a pastiche of weird sounds.

***

And you know, the most effective musical sounds, to me, are “organic.” That is, they originate from vibrating sources, like drum heads and guitar strings. Dating back to the 80s, when canned synth sounds took over the world while I spent hours murdering my fingers, falling in love with guitar strings, I concluded that real sounds resonate physically and emotionally. Turntable scratches (which don’t even lend rhythm to most songs and in fact sound like we’re listening to R2D2 contract laryngitis) are about as soulful as all those Flock of Haircuts synthesized sounds. Ditto for drum machines.

Hip hop is supposed to have soul, but it’s built from sonic blocks not far removed from some of the whitest, blandest music ever.

***

Again, I’m not apologizing. I’m just saying that I continue to be a bit surprised that my broad taste in music, which takes me from Texas to Timbuktu, almost never includes hip hop, and I find that strange.

***
***

THEBOY'S friend Sterling is coming for a sleep-over tonight. I think they’ll have a grand time, though I’m not sure how much sleep anyone in the house is going to get.

***

Kelli may take the kids to Corsicana tomorrow. It could end up being the only day I have completely to myself until the Christmas break between semesters.

***

Friday afternoon… life is getting better by the minute.

3 comments:

Danny Henley said...

Ah, the hip hop problem again.

I think it is fine if your tastes are different. You may never find a hip hop group you dig.

On your comment about the subject matter, I don't think hip hop is really all that different from other genres. There are a whole bunch of musicians who occupy the spectrum from terrible to mediocre. A great number of them, for whatever reason, seem to go "pop" - at least within their target audience. Many of these folks define the general perception of the genre without truly representing the best it has to offer. For instance, more people know Kenny G that Wynton Marsalis, but it would be a damn shame to decide whether or not you like jazz after listening to a Kenny G album.

The part of the spectrum from good to amazing is usually occupied by a select few, and many of them seem to fly a bit under the general public's radar. If you aren't particularly familiar with any genre, you probably haven't hear the best it has to offer.

It's clear you have a preference for collections of sounds made by vibrating instruments. Not a thing wrong with that. Some folks, however, aren't so concerned about what's making the sounds or any particular individual element but rather the overall composition of elements achieving a pleasing effect.

Not being a musician, I can't really explain to you what I like about hip hop. Sometimes it's the lyrics. Sometimes it's the way an artist surprises me with the use of various elements I would have never thought to put together. Sometimes it's the raw, unapologetic nature of a song, from lyrics to samples to beats. Sometimes it's because it doesn't sound like anything I've ever heard before. And sometimes there is that unknown something that gets my foot tapping and puts a smile on my face.

The nice thing about not being a musician is that I don't think about how a song is put together or what methods are being used to make the music until I've already decided whether I like it or not. I just listen and find myself either enjoying it or searching for the fast forward button, and I may or may not ever get around to wondering why.

And one last note: No one in hip hop talks about 40s anymore. That's so early 90s, man!

BB said...

THERE you are... what took you so long, Motorcycle Man?

You know, you make an excellent point about the pointlessness of expecting a genre's popular music to mean a thing to me. Doesn't happen much in any other genre, so why should hip hop be any different, right?

Funny, I regulary listen to Helmet's collaboration with House of Pain, "Just Another Victim." You should hear me botch the lyrics!

I mean to mention Eminem in my original bit and forgot, by the way. He's a punk, but I think he's a talented punk.

That said, 8 Mile felt about as genuine to me as Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo. Yes, when we don't get along we'll just RAP IT OUT!

Okay okay... Thanks for contributing. Don't give up trying to convert me. Honestly, I'd rather "get it" than have to profess that I generally disregard the genre altogether.

Anonymous said...

I remain lukewarm to hip hop myself. There are certain exceptions, of course - love the Public Enemy albums Fear of a Black Planet and The Apocalypse Strikes Black, absolutely adore the Disposable Heroes of Hiphoprosy's lone album. I also recently purchased the Outkast album Stankonia and there's a lot of really interesting, clever stuff on there, not just production-wise but also in the lyrics.

I also dig certain singles, like Coolio's "Gangster's Paradise," for instance (which dates me, I know, but what the hell do you expect - I haven't listened to the radio in years). But I tend to lose interest over the course of entire albums when it comes to hip-hop. I tried Blackalicious (Blazing Arrow) and De La Soul (the infamous 3 Feet High & Rising, in fact), but while I dug the records in small doses, I couldn't sustain any real enjoyment over the course of the full length records.

I too have a hard time holding on to rap songs because of the lack of obvious hooks. Not sure why it's an issue for me with hip-hop when it's not with African music, a great deal of which is also based on percussion and vocals instead of melodic instruments.

I also have to cop to an innate prejudice against electronic-based music. Not all of it, but it's harder to win me over without some real instruments, or at least not pre-programmed ones, in there somewhere. Not impossible - one of the things I like about Public Enemy is their genius way with arranging samples - but difficult. That's just my personal taste, though, and has nothing to do with hip-hop's artistic choices.

I respect hip-hop as a form, especially since it's been a huge influence on pretty much everything that's come after it, from Rush inserting a clumsy rap into "Roll the Bones" to the neo-soul and adult contemporary stuff that's borrowed its rhythms. And while Limp Bizkit and its ilk may indicate otherwise, hip-hop and metal are natural mates, I think, when combined correctly. (See: Anthrax + Public Enemy, Ice-T + Slayer.)

I especially respect folks like Public Enemy and the Roots who have something interesting to say outside of the usual trash talk.

What it comes down to for me, though, is a matter of time, or lack of it. I haven't totally explored all the rock & roll and R&B I want to hear yet, not to mention jazz and world music, and hip-hop keeps getting pushed into the "someday, maybe" category when it comes to my listening habits. If I ever learn to live without sleep, I'll delve deeper into hip-hop and other things, but at this point in my life, I'm not going to push aside other things I really love to get to it, know what I mean?

Michael